OpenSolaris NAS with ZFS
I read Jonathan Schwartz’s blog. I don’t know why. I am interested in what he has to say, despite the fact that his blog seems to be more PR than substance some times. Maybe I do it also because I admire Sun’s openness, want to support it and wish other companies would do the same. Anyway, today I was reading this post and was inspired. Basically it’s an internal memo about restructuring and blah blah, but there was one part about Sun placing the NAS group within their systems division and a blurb about ZFS. I had a single picture in my head, a NAS running OpenSolaris with ZFS. I’ve been reading up on ZFS for a while, but never had a chance to play it despite having installed Solaris in VMWare a few times.
I use FreeNAS and love it, but having ZFS on a NAS device might just push me towards using Solaris. There are a few complications, although they may be minor. There’s no Samba by default in OpenSolaris, and I may need to build in some of FreeNAS’s other services, but I’m hoping ZFS will make it worthwhile. The hardest part, I think, would be ease of management. I don’t know if OpenSolaris has something like Linux’s Webmin, or maybe something like VNC would be quick a dirty way to get GUI management–although managing a NAS in a desktop environment hardly seems like streamlined management.
I’m also encouraged to see that I’m not the only one who has thought of this. A quick Google search brings up a ton of stuff.
Robust NAS appliances will be a hot commodity in the consumer market in the next 5 to ten years as people start relying more on their home networks for their media and need something to store it and back it up. Windows Home Server shows Microsoft has faith in that market and that it’s not just for geeks with a Linux distro, an old PC< and a whole lot of hard-drives.
April 10, 2007 at 5:47 am
Recently, it was announced that ZFS would become part of teh FreeBSD code base. I hoped beyond hope that it would therefore find itself into FreeNAS (so I could have my cake and eat it too), but alas the word from the FreeNAS folks is that it won’t show up it FreeNAS until next year at the earliest since the FreeBSD implementation of ZFS is still quite experimental. On a brighter note, I setup a Solaris 10 NAS with ZFS in VMWare and it is running beautifully…more on that later.
October 29, 2007 at 1:56 am
Sean,
Good post, I’ve been searching around for the same thing. I was researching setting up open solaris and zfs this weekend. It occurred to me that zfs on freenas is possible since its in bsd…Thanks for the info about it happening sometime next year. a site search of “zfs” on freenas.org turned up nothing. =)
Anyway, I guess zfs is going to remain one of the killer apps for solaris since the license issues with linux are keeping that from happening (outside of userspace) and BSD is a smaller market….
Thanks for the info. -G
November 4, 2008 at 11:32 am
Hi,
you may want to try my new opensolaris distribution “PulsarOS”. You can find the newest version under: http://developer.berlios.de/project/pulsaros
If you have questions, please write me an email.
Cheers
Thomas
February 12, 2009 at 6:14 pm
There is an alpha version of Freenas (0.7) that includes zfs support.
February 12, 2009 at 9:56 pm
I’ve built out an OpenSolaris2008.11 NAS with external storage (ZFS of course) running in VMWare Server 2. It works pretty well. Since it’s a VM, if the physical machine dies, I can move the VM (and storage) to another machine and be up and running pretty quickly.
March 30, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Hi,
I’m building a box running a debian host with VMWare server 2 (LAMP + JBoss AS + … many things including a NAS). While search about ZFS and VM I found this post.
I’d be interested in details about your setup. I’ve been playing a bit with VMWare server 2 but couldn’t find a way to feed the VM with the physical drives. I’m a bit reluctant to build a ZFS on 1To virtual drives …
August 19, 2009 at 4:45 pm
@Neraud
This is the problem I am also having. I would like to keep things virtual, but VMWare Server 2 has removed support for physical drives.Virtual Box is a poor performer networking wise.
If you’ve figures out your setup, please share!